This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
About Flimp Flimp is a premier provider of employee benefits communications, educational content, texting and decision-support tools for employers, consultants, enrollers, and insurancecarriers.
NJ Transit’s workers’ compensation insurancecarrier notified Joseph of its legal right to recover all money paid on his workers’ compensation claim from the third-party potentially liable for his injuries. Joseph settled with his uninsured motorist (UM) insurancecarrier for $14,000 in the underlying action.
District Court for the District of Colorado, the Supreme Court of Colorado held that an employee who receives workers’ compensation benefits for injuries caused by an underinsured third-party tortfeasor is not barred from pursuing further recovery from his or her employer’s UM/UIM insurer [ Klabon v. 2024 CO 66, 2024 Colo.
In addressing the public policy argument, the Court interpreted the insurance policy's language by the insurancecarrier, who asserted that it had no duty to defend under the employer's liability insurance policy with Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. 2024) Decided December 22, 2024.
In a well-written opinion with careful analysis, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire reversed and remanded a decision by the state’s Compensation Appeals Board (CAB) that denied benefits to a teacher who sustained a serious MRSA epidural abscess following a work-related camping trip [ Appeal of Southworth , 2024 N.H. LEXIS 9 (Jan.
Home Improvement Company of Vermont , 2024 VT 41, 2024 Vt. LEXIS 42 (July 19, 2024)]. Burnett sought workers’ compensation benefits with the employer’s Vermont insurancecarrier, which denied the claim citing a lack of jurisdiction. Burnett appealed to the Vermont Department of Labor.
Hearing Off.*), 2024 Pa. The appellate court agreed with the petitioning workers’ compensation insurancecarrier that that the Red Book values did not reflect AWP as required by the Act. Summit Pharm. Bureau of Workers’ Comp. LEXIS 1 (Jan.
The NJ Supreme Court will now review whether the insurance policy's exclusion relieves an insurancecarrier of the duty to defend the employer against the employee's claims, which were characterized as intentional wrongs under the Laidlow standard. 3d 412, May 10, 2024. 22, 2023 , Certification Granted, 257 N.J.
Why Health Plans Promote RULA The 2024 MHPAEA Report to Congress exposed a grim truth: up to 92% of therapists listed in health plan directories couldnt offer an appointment within 30 days. But RULA is more than just a telehealth solution. Thats where RULA shines. For Employers: No Extra Contracts, No Extra Headaches.
For policymakers, this study suggests that there may be a need to reform the workers' compensation system to ensure that workers receive the benefits they are entitled to without insurancecarriers delaying and denying appropriate medical care. Legal Help Boosts Worker's Compensation Benefits, www.gelmans.com (12/06/2024) [link].
Boston | February 6, 2024 Flimp , a premier provider of employee benefits and HR communications solutions, educational content, texting and decision-support tools, today released its new Total Rewards Statements product.
Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Intentional Tort Claim Against Co-Employee In Ortez v. 17, 2024), the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed a $28.9 million judgment against an insurancecarrier in a case involving the application of a fellow employee exclusion to a workplace auto accident claim. Penn Nat’l Sec.
Digital Postcards Drive 87% Engagement for First-Time Users, Reinforcing the Power of Multimedia and Mobile-Friendly Benefits Communication BOSTON – October 1, 2024 Flimp , a leading provider of employee benefits communications and decision-support tools, today announced the results of its 2023-24 Open Enrollment Case Study and Trends Report.
When the Commission awarded benefits, Duke Medical Center and its insurancecarrier appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the award. 14, 2024), the court affirmed death benefits to a cemetery worker who assisted with COVID-19 victim burials without protective equipment. Transdev Bus on Demand LLC , 2024 N.Y.
Changes within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) could have negative economic repercussions for states that rely on a loophole that allows workers' compensation insurancecarriers to benefit from Social Security Disability payments through reverse offsets. DOGE Changes: Workers' Comp Costs Rise?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 46,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content