This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
[The following notes background and discussion points from a series of sessions Disability Management undergraduates completing a 4 th year course on Workplace Insurance and Benefits. Part 1 explores the reasons for the lack of trust in disabilityinsurance. Skepticism and misconceptions about insurance are pervasive.
Many workers’ compensation jurisdictions and work-disabilityinsurers have noted increasing mental disorder (also called psychological injury, mental injury) claims over time. US Social Security provides benefits to workers for certain disabilities. In this post, we survey some of the data reflecting this increase.
Last time, we outlined the growth in mental disorder/psychological injury claims in workers' compensation and related workplace insurance programs. On the disabilityinsurance side, this shift has meant changes to policies and procedures. Disabilityinsurers also want to limit their liability to non-work-related cases.
The apparent rise in mental disability claims is a significant issue for disabilityinsurers and workers’ compensationsystems. The observed rise in workers’ compensation claims for mental injury must be interpreted in context. Here is a brief recap of our discussion so far.
Artificial intelligence [AI] opens new frontiers for workers’ compensation law firms and insurance companies. Last week, Google announced new applications that will vastly expand how workers’ compensation claims can be serviced, managed, and supported. This can be achieved using a variety of tools and techniques.
The 1948 adoption of the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Law (marking the unanimity of this concept in the nation). The implementation of Social Security DisabilityInsurance (1956). What "moments matter" right now in the American workers' compensationsystems? The passage of the Job Safety Law of 1970 (OSHA).
AI will not change the functions of any disabilityinsurance or workers’ compensationsystems. have reported current application of AI in the insurance and workers’ compensation sector. Workers’ compensation or disabilityinsurance are not islands.
The bill sets time limits for workers' compensationinsurers and self-insured employers to notify the SIF when supplemental workers' compensation benefits are required under the bill. These reductions parallel the reductions provided under current law for claimants who were injured before 1980.
In the accompanying slides and in some responses, I provide additional references as a starting point for understanding and comparing initial workers’ compensation. All workers’ compensationsystems pay the same rate for lost wages…right? I could find only one jurisdiction with no maximum on insured earnings: Manitoba.
To forestall this eventuality, the majority of North American workers’ compensation jurisdictions adjust periodic payments (sometimes called workers’ compensation pensions or permanent disability payments) to account for increases in the cost of living. And exactly whose basket we are considering can make a big difference.
[The following is a general response to questions from students in workers’ compensation, disability management, and workplace insurance courses. While prevention, control, and treatment questions top the list, workers’ compensation questions are being raised. The law and policy will vary by specific jurisdiction].
American General Insurance Co. , 2d 315 (1955), represents a landmark in the development of workers compensation law, particularly regarding the compensability of psychological injuries. The Case and Its Context The 1955 Texas Supreme Court decision in Bailey v. 430, 279 S.W.2d
Changes within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) could have negative economic repercussions for states that rely on a loophole that allows workers' compensationinsurance carriers to benefit from Social Security Disability payments through reverse offsets.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 46,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content